N\u00eb raportin e Partis\u00eb Demokratike p\u00ebr heqjen e imunitetit t\u00eb Belinda Ballukut, t\u00eb depozituar n\u00eb Kuvend, argumentohet se imuniteti i deputetes duhet t\u2019i hiqet p\u00ebr shkak se pozita e saj \u00ebsht\u00eb r\u00ebnduar, hetimet jan\u00eb intensifikuar dhe se ka rrezikshm\u00ebri q\u00eb e pandehura t\u00eb \u2018helmoj\u00eb\u2019 provat.<\/p>\n
belinda balluku spak prokuroret e spakProkuroria e Posa\u00e7me ka argumentuar se, pas momentit t\u00eb caktimit t\u00eb mas\u00ebs s\u00eb pezullimit nga detyra t\u00eb Ballukut si z\u00ebvend\u00ebs kryeministre dhe ministre e Infrastruktur\u00ebs dhe Energjis\u00eb, nevojat e sigurimit ndaj saj jan\u00eb r\u00ebnduar p\u00ebr shkak se po kryhen hetime t\u00eb tjera, q\u00eb kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me disa procedura t\u00eb tjera tenderimi, si edhe me nj\u00eb koncension.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb mbledhjen e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Mandateve dhe Imunitetit, q\u00eb u zhvillua me dyer t\u00eb mbyllura, Kryeprokurori Klodian Braho ka theksuar se nga dy procedura tenderuese, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebt u dha masa e pezullimit, aktualisht jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb 8, gj\u00eb q\u00eb e r\u00ebndon pozit\u00ebn aktuale t\u00eb saj. D\u00ebnimi maksimal i deputetes mund t\u00eb shkoj\u00eb deri n\u00eb 35 vite, p\u00ebr shkak se si\u00e7 argumenton ai, d\u00ebnimi jepet p\u00ebr secilin rast n\u00eb fjal\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u201cPra, e ka par\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb nen n\u00eb raport me dy procedura, sepse llogariti edhe rrezikun e personit t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs, edhe mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e denimit q\u00eb mund t\u00eb marr\u00eb personi, ndaj me 2 episode teorikisht mund t\u00eb d\u00ebnohet deri n\u00eb 10 vjet. N\u00eb qoft\u00eb se ato nga 2 b\u00ebhen 8 episode (fakte penale), nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e nj\u00ebjta situate. \u00cbsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjti nen, por p\u00ebrs\u00ebritet 8 her\u00eb. Pra, kur caktohet d\u00ebnimi, caktohet p\u00ebr secil\u00ebn vep\u00ebr dhe teorikisht mund t\u00eb shkoj\u00eb edhe deri n\u00eb d\u00ebnimin maksimal me 35 vjet burg. Pra, nuk \u00ebshte e nj\u00ebjta situat\u00eb, pavar\u00ebsisht se \u00ebsht\u00eb e nj\u00ebjta dispozit\u00eb.\u201d, theksoi Braho.<\/p>\n
PJES\u00cb NGA RAPORTI:<\/p>\n
\u201cKlodjan Braho \u2013 Analiza e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 19.11.2025, por edhe k\u00ebrkesa prokuroris\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb moment lidhet vet\u00ebm me dy procedurat e para t\u00eb prokurimit. K\u00ebrkesa depozituar Kuvendit lidhet edhe me procedurat shtes\u00eb. N\u00ebse do t\u2019i referohemi p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb masave t\u00eb sigurimit, e ka rregulluar posa\u00e7\u00ebrisht situat\u00ebn neni 229, paragrafi 2, i Kodit Procedures Penale, ku p\u00ebrshkruhet se \u00e7do mas\u00eb duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb n\u00eb raport me r\u00ebnd\u00ebsin\u00eb e faktit dhe sanksionin qe parashikohet p\u00ebr vepr\u00ebn penale. Jemi n\u00eb situat\u00ebn q\u00eb r\u00ebndesia e faktit ndryshuar, nga 2, jan\u00eb shtuar edhe 6 apo 7 procedura te tjera;<\/p>\n
sanksioni ka ndryshuar, nga dy d\u00ebnime maksimumi i mundshem deri ne 5 vjet, mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb situata juridike q\u00eb personi do t\u00eb d\u00ebnohet edhe p\u00ebr procedura t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb prokurimit, p\u00ebr secil\u00ebn prej tyre. Mbajme parasysh: vazhdim\u00ebsia, p\u00ebrs\u00ebritja, rrethanat lehtesuese apo r\u00ebnduese. Ka vazhdim\u00ebsi, ka p\u00ebrs\u00ebritje veprimeve n\u00eb koh\u00eb, ka rrethana r\u00ebnduese, sepse jan\u00eb kryer t\u00eb gjitha n\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunim me persona t\u00eb tjer\u00eb, q\u00eb me s\u00eb shumti jan\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebt persona. Duke i mbledhur bashk\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb k\u00ebta elemente q\u00eb ka parashikuar ligji, ne vler\u00ebsojm\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebria \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e lart\u00eb n\u00eb raport me nevojat t\u00eb e sigurimit, q\u00eb sot mund t\u00eb parandalohen me masat ekzistuese, dhe k\u00ebrkon nj\u00eb mas\u00eb tjet\u00ebr q\u00eb t\u2019i k\u00ebnaq\u00eb nevojat e sigurimit.<\/p>\n
At\u00ebher\u00eb, kam p\u00ebrshtypjen se un\u00eb iu pergjigja nj\u00ebh\u00ebr\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pyetjeje, megjithat\u00eb po e qart\u00ebsoj s\u00ebrish. \u00cbsht\u00eb qart\u00ebsisht e p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb \u00e7do arsye pse kemi ardhur sot n\u00eb Kuvend. Elementi q\u00eb Kushtetuesja kishte pezulluar pezullimin nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb pjes\u00eb e p\u00ebrmbajtjes s\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs. P\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb pjes\u00eb e p\u00ebrmbajtjes s\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebrgjigja m\u00eb e qart\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb: nuk lidhet me at\u00eb pjes\u00eb, edhe pse, n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin ton\u00eb, ajo e r\u00ebndon m\u00eb tep\u00ebr.<\/p>\n
Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kaq e thjesht\u00eb t\u00eb themi se gjyqtari e pa nj\u00ebher\u00eb nevoj\u00ebn p\u00ebr nenin 258, por, p\u00ebrs\u00ebri, neni 258 nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebshtu. Pra, e ka par\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb nen n\u00eb raport me dy procedura, sepse llogariti edhe rrezikun e personit t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs, edhe mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e denimit q\u00eb mund t\u00eb marr\u00eb personi, ndaj me 2 episode teorikisht mund t\u00eb d\u00ebnohet deri n\u00eb 10 vjet.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb qoft\u00eb se ato nga 2 b\u00ebhen 8 episode (fakte penale), nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e nj\u00ebjta situate. \u00cbsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjti nen, por p\u00ebrs\u00ebritet 8 her\u00eb. Pra, kur caktohet d\u00ebnimi, caktohet p\u00ebr secil\u00ebn vep\u00ebr dhe teorikisht mund t\u00eb shkoj\u00eb edhe deri n\u00eb d\u00ebnimin maksimal me 35 vjet burg. Pra, nuk \u00ebshte e nj\u00ebjta situat\u00eb, pavar\u00ebsisht se \u00ebsht\u00eb e nj\u00ebjta dispozit\u00eb.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar qart\u00eb shkaku pse kemi ardhur sot n\u00eb Kuvend. Masat e sigurimin ekzistuese jan\u00eb caktuar p\u00ebr dy procedura, p\u00ebr dy episode. Pas caktimit t\u00eb mas\u00ebs jan\u00eb zbuluar fakte q\u00eb kan\u00eb ndodhur para caktimit t\u00eb saj, t\u00eb cilat tregojn\u00eb dyshime edhe p\u00ebr 6 procedura t\u00eb tjera, me p\u00ebrseritje t\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs m\u00ebnyr\u00eb veprimi dhe me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebt persona bashk\u00ebpun\u00ebtor\u00eb.<\/p>\n
K\u00ebto fakte i jan\u00eb atribuuar personit n\u00ebn hetim. P\u00ebrve\u00e7 k\u00ebtyre, shpjeguam se ka edhe procedura t\u00eb tjera q\u00eb jane objekt hetimi, por q\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb ende nj\u00eb vendimmarrje, q\u00eb t\u2019i jet\u00eb atribuuar personit n\u00eb hetim.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb rastin konkret ne mendojm\u00eb se masat e k\u00ebrkuara jan\u00eb ato q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb caktohen, jan\u00eb masat proporcionale, dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb nga procedura q\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb masat e para. Personi \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb i pandehur p\u00ebr nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb lir\u00eb, por me pas \u00ebsht\u00eb gjetur nj\u00eb fakt tjet\u00ebr dhe jan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar dy masat e sigurimit.<\/p>\n
Jan\u00eb shtuar faktet e reja dhe vet\u00ebm m\u00eb pas prokuroria ka k\u00ebrkuar nj\u00eb mas\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00eb, q\u00eb cenon lirin\u00eb e personit. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb, ne vler\u00ebsojm\u00eb q\u00eb sjellja e prokuroris\u00eb p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb rast \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht proporcionale me nevojat e sigurimit q\u00eb dikton ky hetim.\u201d, ka th\u00ebn\u00eb Braho.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb shkak, rezulton e provuar se ekziston nevoja e kryerjes s\u00eb veprimit nga ana e prokuroris\u00eb, n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb mas\u00ebs s\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar. Nevojat e sigurimit jan\u00eb r\u00ebnduar p\u00ebr personin n\u00ebn hetim dhe t\u00eb pandehur\u00ebn Belinda Balluku.<\/p>\n
\u00cbsht\u00eb fakt q\u00eb prokuroria nuk ka k\u00ebrkuar mas\u00eb sigurimi n\u00eb momentin q\u00eb deputeti Belinda Balluku \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb i pandehur p\u00ebr nj\u00eb fakt penal \u2013 Nd\u00ebrtimi i Tunelit t\u00eb Llogaras\u00eb. M\u00eb pas, ka lindur nevoja p\u00ebr caktimin e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb sigurimit, sepse ajo ka marr\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e personit n\u00ebn hetim p\u00ebr nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr fakt penal<\/p>\n
Nd\u00ebrtimi i Lotit t\u00eb 4 t\u00eb Unaz\u00ebs s\u00eb Madhe t\u00eb Tiran\u00ebs, ku prokuroria dhe gjykata, n\u00eb respekt t\u00eb parimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb dhe proporcionalitetit t\u00eb masave t\u00eb sigurimit perosnal, kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar dhe caktuar nj\u00eb mas\u00eb t\u00eb leht\u00eb t\u00eb sigurimit personal, at\u00eb t\u00eb \u201cNdalimit t\u00eb daljes jasht\u00eb shtetit\u201d dhe t\u00eb mas\u00ebs ndaluese t\u00eb \u201cPezullimit t\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb funksioni a sh\u00ebrbimi publik\u201d. M\u00eb pas, n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb deputetit Belinda Balluku jan\u00eb atribuuar edhe 6 fakte t\u00eb reja penale dhe indicie t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr 3 fakte t\u00eb tjera penale, dhe kjo ka diktuar nevoj\u00ebn e prokuroris\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar autorizimin nga Kuvendi i Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb lejuar paraqitjen n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr caktimin e mas\u00ebs \u201carrest n\u00eb burg\u201d apo \u201carret n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi\u201d.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, mos kryerja e veprimit mund t\u2019i jap\u00eb mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb pandehur\u00ebs q\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmtoj\u00eb hetimet dhe t\u00eb pengoj\u00eb drejt\u00ebsin\u00eb. \u00cbsht\u00eb kompetenc\u00eb e prokuroris\u00eb dhe gjykat\u00ebs q\u00eb m\u00eb pas t\u00eb vler\u00ebsojn\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb periodike vijimin ose jo t\u00eb nevojave q\u00eb diktojn\u00eb kryerjen e nj\u00eb veprimi t\u00eb caktuar n\u00eb mbrojtje t\u00eb hetimeve.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
N\u00eb raportin e Partis\u00eb Demokratike p\u00ebr heqjen e imunitetit t\u00eb Belinda Ballukut, t\u00eb depozituar n\u00eb Kuvend, argumentohet se imuniteti i deputetes duhet t\u2019i hiqet p\u00ebr shkak se pozita e saj \u00ebsht\u00eb r\u00ebnduar, hetimet jan\u00eb intensifikuar dhe se ka rrezikshm\u00ebri q\u00eb e pandehura t\u00eb \u2018helmoj\u00eb\u2019 provat. belinda balluku spak prokuroret e spakProkuroria e Posa\u00e7me ka argumentuar…<\/p>\n